NYELVÉSZ

Nyelvészeti vitafórum
It is currently 2018. April 1, Sunday, 10:37

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 2007. January 24, Wednesday, 22:02 
Offline

Joined: 2006. December 23, Saturday, 19:22
Posts: 859
wiki wrote:
and is probably best-known for his opposition to progressive and liberal policies in these fields


Vettük észre...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 2007. January 24, Wednesday, 13:31 
Offline

Joined: 2004. November 15, Monday, 15:46
Posts: 612
Theodore Dalrymple létező személy (habár tényleg nem ez a neve), persze attól még lehet valakinek a szócsöve... Mondjuk arra van tippem, kinek - élőben is volt szerencsém hallani az illető nyelvészt, és egy helyen dolgoznak:
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/scholars.htm

(Dalrymple = Anthony Daniels, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Dalrymple )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 2007. January 24, Wednesday, 11:18 
Offline

Joined: 2005. June 21, Tuesday, 13:56
Posts: 906
Location: Budapest
erik.svoboda wrote:

Szerintem ezzel elárulta magát a szerző, hiába a női álnév. Közel van, nagyon közel. Ugye ti is felismeritek? :wink:


Ne csigázz! :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 2007. January 24, Wednesday, 10:11 
Offline

Joined: 2006. December 23, Saturday, 19:22
Posts: 859
Quote:
I need hardly point out that Pinker doesn’t really believe anything of what he writes, at least if example is stronger evidence of belief than precept. Though artfully sown here and there with a demotic expression to prove that he is himself of the people, his own book is written, not surprisingly, in the kind of English that would please schoolmarms. I doubt very much whether it would have reached its 25th printing had he chosen to write it in the dialect of rural Louisiana, for example, or of the slums of Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Even had he chosen to do so, he might have found the writing rather difficult. I should like to see him try to translate a sentence from his book that I have taken at random, “The point that the argument misses is that although natural selection involves incremental steps that enhance functioning, the enhancements do not have to be an existing module,” into the language of the Glasgow or Detroit slums.


Szerintem ezzel elárulta magát a szerző, hiába a női álnév. Közel van, nagyon közel. Ugye ti is felismeritek? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Pinker hülye és a nyelvek sem egyenlööek?
PostPosted: 2007. January 24, Wednesday, 9:15 
Offline

Joined: 2004. November 10, Wednesday, 18:20
Posts: 2183
http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-45.html
http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-197.html
http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-229.html
http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-240.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Figyelem!
A faliújságon megjelentek nem képviselik többek közt a következő szervezetek hivatalos véleményét:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group